Mr. Waite made a motion to deny without prejudice. The motion was seconded by Mr. C. Blake. The motion carried unanimously.
B. Carey, representing LandTech third party review, did not get updated storm plans until Monday and had not had a chance to review them. Mr. Koripsky questioned if blasting would be required, fill required, and topography post development. Mr. Carey cannot answer these questions.
Editor’s Note: Teakwood Estates can still be brought again before the committee as soon as the missing information is supplied. “Deny without prejudice” is the committee telling developers they did not provide full information.
